This
book is the third in a long series that Amar is writing about the constitution
using different perspectives. I didn’t realize that until he mentioned it at
the end of this book, when I found out that the one other book I had read by
him was the first in the series. This book starts each chapter by discussing
one state’s connection with a constitutional concept and explores a lot of different
ideas that have been debated in our country’s nearly 250-year history. It was
pretty cool, though not as engaging as the first book in the series. I found
myself a little bored with it by the end. My problem is that the book lacked
any central, unifying theme. It covered lots of different aspects of
constitutional law, but quickly changed subject every 20-odd pages, making it
hard to follow and really get into. I think I’ll give it four out of five stars,
but I didn’t enjoy it as much as I thought I would. I will still be interested
in reading more of Amar’s work though. He writes with a lot of clarity.
No comments:
Post a Comment