Friday, November 9, 2018

Reflection on The Iron Wall: Israel and the Arab World by Avi Shlaim


             From the beginning of the Jewish resettlement of Israel, the Jewish settlers ignored the existence of a Palestinian people and searched instead for an outside power as an ally, a trend that continues to this day from the Ottomans to the British to a flirtation with the French and also the Soviets and finally to a strategic alliance with the United States. I think this is important to understand because it’s the “original sin” that causes a lot of the conflict from the Israeli side. For the first forty years of Israel’s existence it worked, but when the First Intifada began in 1987, Palestinians demanded to be recognized as a people and to get statehood, beginning the odyssey that continues today. Originally, the Gaza Strip was Egypt and the West Bank of the Jordan River was Jordan.
               From the original partition of Israel, David Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first Prime Minister, saw the borders as temporary. Immediately, Arab states attacked Israel from all sides, he had an opportunity. He was relatively moderate. “Revisionists” were Israeli territorial maximalists who wanted al the territory possible immediately. Ben-Gurion also wanted all possible territory but was willing to work to get the land gradually. Therefore, in the leadup to the creation of Israel, Ben-Gurion accepted a smaller amount of land always knowing that he would attempt to get more. The radicals were the followers of Ze’ev Jabotinsky, a hard-right Jewish nationalist, in groups such as the Irgun and the Stern Gang. Menachem Begin, commander of Irgun and future Prime Minister of Israel who would sign a peace treaty with the Egyptians said in 1947, “The partition of Palestine is illegal… Eretz Israel will be restored to the people of Israel. All of it. And for ever.”
               Israel was born into war and was attacked on all sides by its Arab neighbors Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Egypt. Israel fought the war cleverly and well though, and was able to deal with each enemy one by one. Israel won the war and hoped to gain recognition from the Arab states, but they offered Israel even less land than it was given in the 1947 UN declaration. Within three years of this embarrassing defeat, Jordan, Syria, and Egypt all toppled their governments. After the war, Ben-Gurion was solidified as Israel’s primary leader for about another 15 years. He described his priorities:
“First and foremost, we have to see to Israel’s needs, whether or not this brings improvement in our relations with the Arabs. The second factor in our existence is American Jewry and its relationship with us (and the state of America since these Jews live in it). The third thing—peace with the Arabs. This is the order of priorities.”
In 1953, Ben-Gurion resigned as Prime Minister, giving the job to Moshe Sharett, who earnestly wanted peace with Israel’s neighbors, however Ben-Gurion proved a harsh critic of his own anointed heir. After two years Ben-Gurion would become prime minister again in 1955 and precipitate the Suez Crisis in 1956.
               In the lead-up to the Suez crisis, Israeli generals and politicians, especially Moshe Dayan, sought to provoke Egypt to attack them, starting a war. Dayan believed that if Israel played nice it would not get any foreign arms, but that if it “misbehaved” it could extort the major powers for arms as an incentive to act more responsibly. Dayan was fundamentally a hawk and extremely loyal to Ben-Gurion. While the Israelis attempted to provoke Egypt, Ben-Gurion complained that Nasser would not meet with him one-on-one, claiming that if he could just get into a room with Gamel Abdel Nasser, the new Arab Nationalist Egyptian leader, he could make peace. Nasser refused to meet with him. The author suggests that Ben-Gurion knew this and was only scoring political points, but I think that even if that’s true, Nasser is at fault for not meeting with him. He should have called Ben-Gurion’s bluff, but he refused to meet with any Israeli because he was a hardliner. At this point, Ben-Gurion replaced his former partner Moshe Sharett, who had been Foreign Minister, with Golda Meir, chosen precisely because she knew so little about foreign policy. Her job was to rationalize and defend the actions of the Israeli military, led by Defense Minister Moshe Dayan.
               Ben-Gurion was able to team up with the French and the British to attach the Suez Canal, which would be followed by an Anglo-French operation to “stop” the Israelis and restore the canal to European control. The campaign failed when the US and USSR got wind of it and forced everyone to stop where they were, though as a result, Egypt opened up the Straits of Tiran for Israeli use, though not the canal. In 1967, Egypt would renege on this agreement. The Sinai campaign was in a sense the last battle of the 1948 war as it confirmed the Egyptian-Israeli border. In the aftermath of the war, Gamel Abdel Nasser emerged as the leader of the Arab world. Israel found itself more isolated from the West, and its 1957 application to join NATO was rejected.
               At 76 years old, Ben-Gurion resigned, and Levi Eshkol, who was everyone’s first choice to succeed Ben-Gurion, won the Premiership. He was mainly qualified as an economics expert, though like Ben-Gurion, he took on the job of Defense Minister as well. The Arab League solidified Arab unity against Israel and in January 1964, the Arab states declared their goal to be the destruction of Israel for the first time ever. In the coming years, pressure would build again, especially with Syria and Egypt, which symbolically united though they were unconnected by land, a problem that would be remedied by the absorption of Israel. The Israeli Defense Forces welcomed conflict and, led by Moshe Dayan and David Elazar (Northern Command), began to provoke Syria by moving tractors and other equipment into the demilitarized zone until the Syrians shot. This led to a dogfight in which the Israelis shot down six Syrian planes.
               On the Egyptian front, it was not Eshkol but Nasser who did the provoking and he went a step farther than he intended.
“Nasser took three steps that were intended to impress Arab public opinion rather than be a conscious prelude to war with Israel. The first step was to send a large number of troops into Sinai. The second was to ask for the removal of the UN Emergency Force from Sinai. The third and most fateful step, taken on 22 May, was to close the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping. For Israel this constituted a casus belli. It canceled the main achievement of the Sinai Campaign. The Israeli economy could survive the closure of the straits, but the deterrent image of the IDF could not. Nasser understood the psychological significance of this step. He knew that Israel’s entire defense philosophy was based on imposing its will on its enemies, not on submitting to unilateral dictates by them. In closing the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping, he took a terrible gamble—and lost.”
Israel launched its planes into the air and destroyed the entire Egyptian air force in the first day of the war. All their neighbors declared war on them and Israel was able to defeat them each in order, seizing the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights, the first two of which make up today’s occupied Palestinian territories. Israel also seized the Sinai Peninsula, which it would give back later after the October War in 1973. Even the author Avi Shlaim, who takes a very critical view of Israel, calls the Six-Say war a defensive war. This is because Egypt closed the Straits of Tiran, threatening Israel’s existence and nullifying the agreement made after the Suez crisis. Territorial aspirations did not drive Israel to war but emerged as a result of the war and were then realized by Israel. However, prolonging the war to take the Golan Heights cost Israel to lose its diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union, as the Soviets became firmly allied with the Arabs and the United States with the Israelis. On the other hand the Israelis won over the Americans by offering land for peace with the Arab states. However, it was a ruse. They communicated this to the US and not to the Arabs in secret and it was not a real offer. The Arabs’ official position was made at the Khartoum Conference, which ended in the adoption of the “three noes,” no recognition, no negotiation, and no peace with Israel. This was actually a victory for the moderates, as the hardliners wanted to continue active war, while the agreement made would be more of a cold war.
               Golda Meir succeeded Eshkol as Prime Minister in 1969 and formed two principals that became the bedrock of Israeli policy: no return to the pre-1967 borders and no withdrawal without direct negotiations and peace treaties. She constantly talked about peace but didn’t give it much space to develop. She made the mistake of turning down an opportunity to trade Sinai for peace (which would be the exact result of the October war in 1973, the basis of the peace treaty eight years later) and she turned down Anwar Sadat’s (successor to Nasser after his death) interim settlement, which forced him to go to war to save Egyptian pride and honor.
               In October1973, Egypt invaded the Sinai Peninsula and made gains before being turned around by Israel. It was an embarrassment for Golda Meir and she lost the Premiership in 1974 to Yitzhak Rabin, who was unable to make any major gains towards peace. He himself was defeated by Menachem Begin, leader of Likud, the right-wing party that became the first party that was not Labor to put their man/woman in the office of the Prime Minister. Likud’s ideology could be summed up by the term “Greater Israel.” Their primary goal was to make the West Bank and Gaza Strip into Jewish, Israeli territory. Their inspiration was Ze’ev Jabotinsky, the founder of Revisionist Zionism, and their leader was Menachem Begin, who lost both his parents and brother in the Holocaust. Likud was more ideological where Labor had been pragmatic, and their ideology was peace through strength. Israel’s foreign policy became more activist and aggressive with Begin as PM, Yitzhak Shamir as the Foreign Minister, and Ariel Sharon, “the relentless hawk,” as Defense Minister. This coincided with the inauguration of American president Ronald Reagan, and the two countries signed a treaty of strategic cooperation, creating closer military and intelligence cooperation s well as defense research and development. Israel officially became an enemy of the Soviet Union.
               The PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization), began in 1964, started to conduct raids into Israel in 1968. In 1975, a civil war broke out in Lebanon (that would last until 1990) and Syria invaded in 1976. In 1978, Israel achieved its historic peace with Egypt, giving back the Sinai Peninsula and earning much good credit in the Arab world. All that changed when Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 to stop Palestinian attacks and laid a siege upon Beirut, the only time Israel ever laid siege to an Arab capital. It would be known as Israel’s Vietnam. Begin openly proclaimed that he saw this as him fighting against another Hitler, which was a controversial take among Israelis who were against the war of choice. The Israelis had trouble leaving because they wanted a peace treaty from Lebanon; Lebanon could not offer one because it was much weaker than Egypt and could not defy the Arab world.
               In 1984, after a very close parliamentary election after which neither side could form a government, Shimon Peres of the Labor Alignment and Yitzhak Shamir of Likud formed a national unity government of both parties and agreed to alternate the role of Prime Minister with Peres as Premier for the first 25 months and Shamir as Premier for the following 25.  Peres succeeded in getting Israel out of Lebanon, which was truly a disaster. 660 Israelis had died, Israel’s image abroad was damaged, and it spawned the terrorist group Hezbollah, which continues to threaten Israel to this day. Israel was also responsible for a massacre carried out by Christians against Muslims in an Israel-run refugee camp in which 800 Palestinian civilians were slaughtered.
               On December 9th, 1987, an IDF truck hit a Palestinian car near the Jabliah Refugee Camp, killing 4 Palestinians. This accident gave rise to the First Intifada, the dramatic release of the tension that had built up after 20 years of Israeli occupation of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Unlike Israel’s past wars, this involved an internal enemy that fought with guerrilla-style tactics. It lasted from 1987 until 1993, through the end of the Premiership of Yitzhak Shamir in 1992 and peace was made thanks to the Oslo Accords until Yitzhak Rabin in 1993. The result was the establishment of the Palestinian Authority to govern parts of the West Bank and the Palestinian recognition of the state of Israel. Another result was that Jordan washed their hands of the West Bank, leaving it to the Palestinians and allowing Israel to sign a peace treaty with Jordan after the Oslo Accords. A major negative result was the creation of Hamas, a hardline terrorist group that refused to recognize Israel and that decided to continue the fight until today. Finally, Israel was partitioned for the first time since the failed plan in 1947, when the Palestinians rejected partition, thinking they could get the whole of Israel. Rabin was assassinated for his part in the peace deal and succeeded by Shimon Peres.
               However, like the accord caused a split between the PLO/PA run by Fatah and the rejectors of the accord in Hamas, on the Israeli side rose Benjamin Netanyahu, whose father was a disciple of Ze’ev Jabotinsky to the Premiership. He argued that Shimon Peres was an appeaser and ripped up the deal, though he kept the deal with Jordan, managing to survive even though it was based on the earlier Palestinian deal. The Jordan peace deal was the first “warm peace” for Israel, as the Egyptian deal came after a long time of hostility, Jordan had been a consistent partner to Israel. By 1996, Israel established direct diplomatic contacts with fifteen Arab states and no longer faced an Arab boycott, Israel was on the way to peace when Netanyahu and Ariel Sharon intervened. As Ariel Sharon said in 1998, “Everybody has to move, run and grab as many hilltops as they can to enlarge the settlementsbecause everything we take will stay ours… Everything we don’t grab will go to them.”
               Ehud Barak, the former Chief of Staff for the IDF was elected Prime Minister for Labor in 1999 and attempted to make peace with the Syrians, but he found himself trapped in a chasm between the doves and the hawks. The deal failed and he angered American partner Bill Clinton in the process. During his premiership, Ariel Sharon, the new leader of Likud replacing Netanyahu, decided to stage a highly publicized visit with 1,000 security guards to al-Haram al-Sharif, what Jews call the Temple Mount. The day after his visit, large-scale riots broke out in Jerusalem and Palestinians on the Temple Mount threw rocks down at Jewish worshippers praying at the Western Wall. The IDF returned fire with rubber-coated bullets and the Second Intifada (AKA the al-Aqsa Intifada) began. In the first five days 47 Palestinians were killed and 1,885 were wounded. Sharon then won election as Prime Minister against Barak and dropped the hammer on the Palestinians.
               I’m going to finish this up quickly even though there’s a lot more that can be said. Ariel Sharon enjoyed a partnership with the George W. Bush administration, which put the least restrictions on Israel of any American government ever. Sharon decided to unilaterally withdraw from the Gaza Strip, with the idea that it would reduce the demographic relevance of Palestinians to Israel, put off the need for a peace treaty for several years, and give him some room to bargain for more of the West Bank. It was a surprising move from a far-right wing Prime Minister who wanted all of Greater Israel, but like Ben-Gurion, he never intended this to be a final move. Instead it was to be a position from which Israel would get more and more. The Second Intifada ended after 5 years in 2005 with Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and the construction of more Israeli settlements in the West Bank as well as the construction of the West Bank barrier, a system of walls, barbed wire, etc. that cut off Palestine from Israel. Out of site, out of mind.
               Ariel Sharon formed his own party as a centrist counter to Likud but had a stroke and was incapacitated and later died, so he didn’t run in the election. Ehud Olmert took up the Kadima banner and won, but his government lasted a short time, managing to invade Lebanon, before the return of Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu has been the least interested in peace of any Israeli Prime Minister ever and the farthest right-wing in every sense. The book only covers his return in the epilogue, and mainly what you need to know is that he is uninterested in Palestinian conditions of life, survival, and well-being.
               This was a very thorough book that covers conversations and deals in-depth, sometimes too much so. I would have liked more info on the return of Netanyahu and some other things to be cut, but what are you gonna do. Overall it was a great way to understand why Israel acts the way it does and who the major players have been in its foreign policy.
              
Miscellaneous Facts:
  • Theodor Herzl’s inspiration for a Jewish state came as a reaction to the Dreyfuss affair in France. He saw the Jews as not just a religious group but a nation.
  • In 1953, Ariel Sharon, who would be Prime Minister of Israel nearly 50 years later, commanded Unit 101, an Israeli special forces group, and was responsible for a massacre at Qibya, Jordan, where 45 houses were destroyed and 69 civilians killed.
  • The Norwegian chief of staff of the UNTSO (United Nations Truce Supervision Organization) was named “Odd Bull.”
  • Major General Shlomo Goren, chief rabbi of the IDF wanted to blow up the Dome of the Rock after the Six-Day War but was denied this.
  • Prime Minister Levi Eshkol was known for his humor and after the victory in the Six-Day War, “he began to sport a Churchillian V sign. His wife Miriam, a militant moderate, said to him: ‘Eshkol, what are you doing? Have you gone mad?’ With characteristic humor he replied, ‘No. This is not a V sign in English. It is a V sign in Yiddish! Vi krikht men aroys?’ Roughly translated, this means ‘How do we get out of this?’”
  • Lea Rabin refused to shake Benjamin Netanyahu’s hand after her husband’s death because she blamed him for inciting it. She was moved by the sincerity and warmth of Yasser Arafat on the other hand.



Avi Shlaim. The Iron Wall: Israel and the Arab World (Updated and Expanded) (Kindle Locations 2037-2039). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition.

No comments:

Post a Comment